Home
Shaenon K. Garrity
This is where I write stuff.
Friends' Entries 

Advertisement

Customize
24th-Nov-2009 06:34 pm - Ramble, Part 76: True/False/?
To accept Intuitionism is, among other things, to accept that some meaningful mathematical statements are neither true nor false. From the standpoint of symbolic logic, this entails introducing additional truth values beside True and False; in other words, to contemplate "multi-valued logics".

On the gripping hand )

Ramble Contents
24th-Nov-2009 04:28 pm - OK!
Over the past year I've spared y'all from around a dozen frantic posts explaining how I spent days preparing a huge data analysis presentation for the S---- study investigators, and then at the meeting they (very politely) berated me for 45 minutes over the first three slides, and declared they didn't want to see the rest. Not that I would have kept on talking about it, I mean that this happened on three or four separate occasions, with their unspoken and contradictory requirements changing each time. But I am going to post about this.

A couple of months ago, I insisted that we sit down and write out what the next set of analyses were going to be. Then I verified it by email, found out they'd changed their minds, wrote up an alternative, verified that, talked with a fellow postdoc about it, met with one of the investigators, sent it out for approval again, made the requested changes, sent it out again, made an interim presentation on exactly what I was going to do, and over the weekend, I did it.

Today I presented on it. It was a success and everyone was pleased! I can move on and maybe get something out of this at last.

I'm making the people in charge of this study sound like bad guys, but that's not really true (they do deserve some cussing out, but I've already vented elsewhere). This is a huge federal grant, the equivalent of several R01s rolled together. There are five primary investigators and two statisticians, each with their own approach to the data. It's hard to get them all in the room at the same time, let alone to get everyone to agree on an analysis. But I managed to clear things with the ones who really mattered -- who happen to be all the same ones who were at today's meeting. I triumphed over a really difficult situation, and it's to everyone's benefit!


A few months ago, I put together an online questionnaire study. UCSF doesn't have any undergrads, so [info]dragonpaws agreed to help out and run it on students from her school. I sent her the IRB forms, and two days later it was approved! Then I sent her the website, and a day and a half later we had 100 responses! At UM that would have taken at least a month!


This afternoon John IMed me to show me an exam that had a series of Fermi problems... except that instead of estimating the answer, you were supposed to estimate your 94% confidence interval. I asked what it could possibly mean to be 94% confident about something -- of all the (probability-weighted) scenarios you can imagine, 94% of them give an answer within this range? John said maybe, but if you're thinking in bayesean terms then it just means that you're 94% confident. We got into another long conversation about bayesean statistics. I felt very clever because I kept coming up with ways to understand things in terms of the frequentist paradigm I'm already trained in, and kind of foolish, because part of the point is that with bayesean statistics, you don't have to mess about with all these imaginary distributions.


Then I showed our recruiter =concatenate(), saving her countless hours of cutting and pasting.


It's been a good day!
24th-Nov-2009 08:02 pm - Hurmmm.... X-men?
So now I'm reading-
X-men Forever [too much crazy stuff to list]
Dark X-men [Norman Osborne shouldn't mess with Mystique. Bad things are gonna happen, plus EvilDr.McCoy :)]
New Mutants [this is a total retro trip to me, but it also manages to have a good feel as a followup to the X-force era as well]
X-men Legacy [Rogue as younger X-men's tutor, and Daniel Arcuna's art is somethingelse]
Uncanny X-men First Class [cheesy allages miniseries title]
Ultimate Comics X [ART ADAMS ON AN ONGOING!]
Uncanny X-men


Sure there's too many mutants [Decimation clearly did NOT help things], but I've been enjoying the artist choices for X-books lately, love the Dark X-men storyline, and just have a fun time with X-men Forever. I've now sucummed into getting Uncanny X-men, despite not really being a big Greg Land fan [UrGhHhHhH! The light table abuse! Still pretty, but urgh 0_o Did love the Sisterhood though. I hope they find a good way to use Maddie someday], because hey, The Dodsons are the other art team, and it's pretty good either way.

Though between superhero comics, Transformers comics [which I pick up sporadically], webcomics and manga [I buy a ton, and am currently plowing through the library's stuff on top of that], I'm not really reading as many indy comics as I used too. Mostly cause the stuff I really like isn't being published as often.... Diamond's shift to not offering stuff again has also lead to a decrease to me. I dunno. Might pick up something of that sort sometime soon. Though mainstream publishers like Scholastic are offering stuff that's along the lines of what I liked in indy comics anyways.

It seems like Slave Labor and Oni are the only small publishers of the early 00's still around, with Jeff Smith's Rasl and Fantagraphics being the other exceptions. Much of what I see popping up is licensed comics or off-brand superhero stuff [Alex Ross's Project SuperPowers looks cool mind you], so it's a really big change from when I was a kid and you'd see all kinds of stuff in Previews.
24th-Nov-2009 06:42 pm - Great Googly Moogly
Okay, I'm reading about the dust-up about Harlequin (the romance writers, y'know) starting their own vanity publishing arm*, and as I go through the comments, every now and then one jumps out at me and breaks my heart into tiny little pieces.

These comments say things like "I know you have to pay to get published..." or "Up until I read this thread, I didn't realize you didn't pay to get published."

Oh sweet god.

You are all very smart people of impeccable taste--or at least, you're reading the blog, so I like to pretend--but just on the slim chance that any of you are not quite as informed on this topic as you could be--NO NO NO NO NO A THOUSAND TIMES NO.

The publisher pays you. ALWAYS. You do not pay the publisher. EVER. It does not cost the author to publish the book. The publisher does all that. They take the book and give you money. The only place you sign the check, to paraphrase, is on the back, is over the little line that says "Endorse here."

You don't pay to get published. The publisher pays you for the privilege of taking your book. You invest time and energy and printer cartridges. The publisher always pays you.

(This is also why you don't hire an illustrator--because the publisher hires them. And pays them. That is how it works.)

It's okay if you don't know this stuff. Don't feel dumb. Publishing is weird and arcane and I still take royalty statements to my buddy Deb and go "What does this mean?" and I still don't understand half of it. You're not dumb. Much of this isn't intuitive. You don't have to take my word for it--find the author resource online of your choice. and ask questions. There is no need to be embarassed.

I have produced...uh...if we count Digger volumes...nine books through four publishers. One of the publishers is a very respectable small press, one is a starting-out-but-getting-there small press, and two are big giant scary publishers with New York offices and budgets bigger than a third world country.

All four of them pay me money. Sometimes they pay me lots of money (at least by my standards, which are quite modest) and sometimes they pay me a couple hundred bucks. The big houses can afford to pay me mondo advances, the small presses can afford to take me to dinner.** This is fine.

The point is, they all pay me. I don't pay them. Ever.

The sum total I have spent on any book I have ever written was about two bucks worth of postage to send out the initial draft of Black Dogs, over a decade ago, and I did buy a decent pen in order to sign copies of Dragonbreath. (And by "decent" I mean like 2.99 for a pair. I am not a pen snob.) Then I lost the pen.

The only times money goes the other way is if I'm buying a couple of copies of Digger--I get free copies of each, of course, but sometimes I want to sell them at cons where Sofawolf's not attending--and in this case, they just slap the wholesale price against my royalties. This is pretty normal, and the only example I can come up with off the top of my head. (Okay, no, wait, I sent a print to my editor once because she wanted a signed art print of the Nurk cover for her office. Technically I paid for that, but I didn't stuff twenties in there or anything.)

I do not pay for those big publishing runs. Authors don't. There's a little under thirty thousand copies of Dragonbreath floating around out there. Total cost to me = $0.

If somebody is telling you that the authors do pay for these, they are either misinformed or...well...you're smart wombats, you can figure out yourself why somebody might have a vested interest in believing that you give people money for this sort of thing and who might not have your best interests at heart.

Now. Self-publishing. This is something else. If you are self-publishing, then you know it up front. (If you have to ask if you're self-publishing, there are problems already.) We can talk about this later and in lots of detail if anybody wants. Self-publishing is great for what it does well. I am a big fan of self-publishing. ( I myself have work in a self-published little anthology that our local comics group puts out every year, as a print-on-demand thing. You can buy it on Lulu, it's got some nice stuff in it, a couple of the members sell the occasional copy at conventions. I didn't buy any of the wholesale copies because I don't have table space in my usual con kit. Cost to me = $0. Profit if I HAD sold them at the table = maybe a buck or two. It's a neat little thing to have, but none of us are making money on it, and it's not a publishing credit I'd take seriously. I could talk about this longer, but we're already running long.) Self-publishing is kinda like merchandising. I would self-publish a webcomic the same way that I would get a run of T-shirts printed, I'd sell them at cons or over the internet, like T-shirts, and I would expect to make approximately the same amount of money.

So. To recap. They pay us. That's how it works. If you are paying them, then something is very very wrong.

If you're self-publishing, things are a little more complicated, but you should really only be self-publishing for stuff that self-publishing is good at. If you want to be a bestselling fiction author, that's not something self-publishing is particularly good at. If somebody tells you that self-publishing is good for that and you can make zillions if you give them your manuscript and a lot of money, they are predators and need to be ridden out of town on a rail.

Vanity publishing, which is what Harlequin Horizons is offering, is a scam. They take your money by the fistful and dangle this promise that if you pay enough, you can be a Real Writer. Well, Real Writers get paid, they don't pay. Nobody is so bad a writer that they deserve to lose money for it. If you just want readers, put it on the internet, if you just want a physical copy, go to Lulu, but please, PLEASE don't believe that writers have to pay to be successful. Please.


*There are lots of posts and comment wars. The fast and amusing one is here. The gist is that they're implying heavily to the marks that this is a Real Book with Harlequin and then turning around and telling their real authors, who are Not Amused, that no, no, it's not, nobody should think that, and the books won't actually be on shelves or anything, we just kinda found a way to make money off the slush pile. It is very sad and makes me very angry.

**And in no way shape or form should you think I'm raggin' on the small presses--I am deleriously glad they exist because a big New York house wouldn't ever publish Digger, there's just not the demand. Small presses aren't small because they can't be big, it's because they publish things where demand is small, but often very passionate. I do not know how many copies of Digger have sold, but I'm sure all for volumes are less than the initial, not-very-large-by-industry-standards print-run of Nurk. That doesn't mean Digger's bad, it's just specialized.

На сайте Kino-Govno.com появился ролик о создании 3D-версии фильма «Вий»:



Обсудить | Информация о фильме | Другие трейлеры
Скопировать в: LiveJournal.com | LiveInternet.ru | Другие
Thank you for reminding me of songs that I loved and then forgot about. Previously, it was Fireflies. Today, it was Put Your Hair Down, which I had not heard in months, if not years. (Decimals are plural, right?)

This also led to me finding the album in question, being reminded that I love two more of the songs on there, and spending money on it, because I am kind of addicted to music.

You usually play boring crap, but it is moments like these that merit you being on my presets.

Sincerely,

Sooz
24th-Nov-2009 02:41 pm - Art contest! One week left
Like the title says. There's just ONE WEEK left to enter my art contest!

Details about rules, prizes, etc. can be found here: http://bladespark.livejournal.com/957852.html
I've picked up some new readers, so thought I'd take part in this meme.

You know how sometimes people on your friendslist post about stuff going on in their life, and all of a sudden you think "Wait a minute? Since when were they working THERE? Since when were they dating HIM/HER? Since when???" And then you wonder how you could have missed all that seemingly pretty standard information, but somehow you feel too ashamed to ask for clarification because it seems like info you should already know? It happens to all of us sometimes.

Please copy the topics below, erase my answers and put yours in their place, and then post it in your journal! Please elaborate on the questions that would benefit from elaboration. One-Word-Answers seldom help anyone out.


10 Questions )
24th-Nov-2009 05:03 pm - Book Log
55. The Amber Spyglass - Philip Pullman *

Excellent end to the series. I really enjoyed both the story and the message (as I understand it).
24th-Nov-2009 03:50 pm(no subject)
The Big Picture is featuring selected entries from the National Geographic International Photography Contest 2009 today. Stunning!

Crossposted to my Dreamwidth account at http://telophase.dreamwidth.org/1632789.html. You can comment here or there.
24th-Nov-2009 04:43 pm - Marni - or, gah! Colour!
Marni from Stargazer

Larger version after the cut! )

Von
24th-Nov-2009 03:37 pm(no subject)
I chose not to get a table at Yulecon this year. Perhaps that was a better move than I knew.

Crossposted to my Dreamwidth account at http://telophase.dreamwidth.org/1632586.html. You can comment here or there.
24th-Nov-2009 01:31 pm - Day 24/NaBloPoMo
Boolean search: Queen and "Bohemian Rhapsody" and Jim Henson and Muppets



Found via twitter, thanks to http://twitter.com/cakewrecks!

Whenever I write about and link to my brother's photography, the positive feedback is just overwhelming. It seems that people all over the world love his work just as much as I do, and as a big brother that makes me put my hands on my hips and smile like a goon.

If you haven't seen them before, here are a few of his pictures, from Jer's Flickr thingy (click to embiggen):

Jeremy Wheaton Photography at Flickr

Jeremy Wheaton Photography at Flickr

Jeremy Wheaton Photography at Flickr

On his website, Jeremy says:

I'd have to say that my father was my biggest influence for photography. While I was growing up it seemed like he always had a camera in one hand pointing it at us kids. But looking at his boxes of photos in recent years I noticed that he also had lots of photos of pine cones, rusty nails in boards, fence posts, etc. He didn't just capture wonderful moments of our childhood, he also captured the beauty of the world around us that we probably never noticed back then. 

I got my first digital camera only a few years ago but I quickly fell in love with the artistic value in photography. I love to get outdoors with my camera. Having the camera makes me slow down more than I would otherwise and look at my surroundings a bit more closely in different ways. The one thing I love about photography more than any other aspect is the ability to capture that one single moment the way I saw it. I hope you like what I saw in those moments. 

I hope this doesn't sound too paternal, but I just love it that Jeremy is carrying on the Wheaton Photographic Tradition™. I am as proud of him as I am happy for him*.

Jeremy lives in Montana, which means I don't get to see him ... well, ever. I miss him a lot, so I talk to him as often as I can, which is pretty easy since we live in the future and everything. 

For at least a year, we've been talking about collaborating on a book together, where he'd take pictures and I'd write prose to go with them, but we've both been too busy with our jobs and families and dogs to actually work on it. Last week, though, I was able to convince him to get excited and make some things on his own with his pictures, which he put into a CafePress store. I think they're lovely, and I thought that some of you, out there in Internetland, may agree.

And if you see this post, Jer: I love you and I miss you.

*(That's a lot.)

24th-Nov-2009 02:59 pm(no subject)
TIME photoshops semen into senator's hair, then removes post (but google cached it) http://ping.fm/dQBzv
24th-Nov-2009 02:59 pm - Freakin' awsome cartoon.
http://ping.fm/QQhHZ

From: http://ping.fm/p2sgf
24th-Nov-2009 03:41 pm - Can of worms part II
Another email out to my relative. Cut for being a wall of Text.
follow Rule #1 please.

============================

Hey there _____ :)

Please don't take my previous email as me telling you to Not express your opinion. I objected to the parts in the email that were from what I've read, either exaggerations, or flat out wrong. In particular, the part about the muslin prayer being held in the white house, when it was an Demonstration being held on the lawn at the Capitol Building/Congress, and not IN the White House at all.

Read more... )


I believe in the goodness of people. I think as a whole, people are good. Individually, and in mobs people can be twatwaffles.... But there are people in every country, in every state, in every town trying to do good things. Helping their neighbors, helping the poor, defending those cannot defend themselves.

Whatever our differences are politically, I firmly believe you and ____ are two of those good people.

With all my love,

Michael

Advertisement

Customize
This page was loaded Nov 25th 2009, 12:39 am GMT.